Credible researchers who argue for longer timelines or more tractable safety. This page exists to keep the project balanced and source-driven.
Skeptical of near-term AGI risk / extinction scenarios
Argues that today’s systems lack essential ingredients for autonomous reasoning/planning; expects longer timelines and tractable safety via research progress.
Caution on claims of rapid AGI
Emphasizes gaps in generalization, abstraction, and understanding; warns against hype and over-extrapolation from benchmarks.
Downplays x-risk; prefers focus on near-term practical risks
Advocates for addressing concrete harms (misuse, bias, safety engineering) and building useful regulation without halting progress.